Top Medical Achievement In History - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 977 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/08/07 Category Medicine Essay Level High school Tags: Vaccines Essay Did you like this example? Vaccines are considered one of the top medical achievements in history. Since 1796, when the first successful vaccine was developed against smallpox, the science field has grown to generate more successful vaccines. These vaccines have allowed common diseases from centuries ago to be eliminated. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Top Medical Achievement In History" essay for you Create order From the start of vaccines, many lives have been saved from many life-threatening diseases. Although there are many positives about vaccines, many parents still question the importance of their children being immunized. The reasons why many parents do not want their children immunized vary from religious beliefs, misconceptions they have heard about vaccines, or simply a lack of understanding about what vaccines do. The purpose of vaccines is to create a safe environment for our children and ourselves. Therefore, immunization should be required for all children because of the herd effect, which protects the community, and because vaccines are safe and efficient.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The first reason why children should be immunized is to protect themselves and their community. Herd immunity is the resistance to spread of a contagious disease within a population if sufficiently high proportion of individuals is immune to the disease, especially through vaccination(Oxford English Dictionary definition). The large community group that is vaccinated can provide protection to those individuals who cannot be vaccinated or develop immunity. As a community, we can allow those who rely on herd immunity instead of their own immunity to stop the disease from attacking them.   Statistics have shown the drop of diseases since the development of vaccines. According to a research scientist Emily Willingham After the chickenpox vaccine debuted in the United States in 1995, death rates dropped by as much as 97%. In the U.S., no infants got vaccinated because its not administered to them due to age, but even then, no infants died in 2004 and 2007. The herd effect protected these children from becoming sick. How this worked was, the large portion of the population in the United States was immunized; this prevented the disease from spreading and contaging the unimmunized population. Not only does the herd effect benefit the small or large communities, but it can eventually lead to the decrease of spreading a disease nationally. If herd immunity has been established and maintained in a population for sufficient time, the disease is inevitably eliminated (Wikipedia, Eradication of Diseases). The positives of this effect are very high and provide the safety that we w ant for our children. The second reason why children should be immunized is because the vaccines that are being administered are safe and efficient. Before a vaccine is out to the public, scientists/chemists and administration run many tests to approve the safety of the vaccines. Developing a new vaccine is done through several years, beginning with six developing cycles, with one cycle having three phases. The next step after the development of a vaccine, is the approval from six different FDAs (CDC, Vaccine Testing and the Approval Process). As we can see, the process of developing and approving vaccines is a very long and efficient process in order to ensure the safety of the vaccines to the public. Even after approving and having the vaccines in public, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System tracks any side effects and analyzes the information to maintain the vaccines safety (VAERS). Many statistics have shown that immunization has been one of the most successful medical breakthroughs achieved (Ben Balding, Mandatory Vaccination). The efficiency that the CDC has statistically seen from vaccines gets very high every year. Vaccine efficiency is the percent reduction in disease incidence in a vaccinated group compared to an unvaccinated group under optimal conditions (Defined by RCT/Wikipedia). According to a study done through Pediatric Academic Society Vaccines prevent an estimate of 2.5 million deaths per year and have prevented an estimate of 10.5 million cases of diseases since 2004. Many of the cases where people have died from diseases have been from those who were unvaccinated. This information comes to show that vaccines are very efficient and effective. Some people claim that vaccines contain many chemicals that poison the body. Although part of this statement is true, many of the chemicals do not poison the body. Many vaccines before the 2000s did indeed have chemical compounds such as aluminium, thimerosal, formaldehyde, etc (Vaccine Ingredients, The Truth). These chemicals, according to the CDC, have been either eliminated or the dosage in each vaccine was changed. Furthermore, the amount of chemicals in vaccines is such a small amount that the body is able to run it through the blood almost instantly, and no harm will be caused. Most of the chemicals in vaccines are present in our daily intake of food, and are also already in our bodies for the use of our metabolism. The most damage these chemicals have caused is skin irritation or fevers. (Vaccine ingredients, Vaccine Knowledge) Another argument against vaccines is because of certain religious beliefs, the government shouldnt make vaccines mandatory. Although many people are involved in some sort of faith, it is important to set a standard when it comes to health. The CDC has proven that those with religious beliefs that practice anti-vaccination are most of the percentage of people getting diseases. Most of the time, the community with the same beliefs can cause large outbreaks and can affect the rest of the nation. They can affect others when traveling or entering a school with no vaccinations. No religious belief should have to imperil the health of their own children and those of others.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   In conclusion, the health of society doesnt only involve one individual, but it involves an entire community. To continue having the United States be a preventable-disease-free nation, we need to continue to immunize ourselves and our children. Vaccines will help protect others from diseases through the herd immunity, and they will continue to be safe and efficient as long as we continue to use them.

John Locke Explains Economic Inequality - 844 Words

In his Second Treatise of Government, John Locke creates an argument that details how individuals attain private property and how some can end up with more property than others. He attempts to justify the resulting economic inequality, but is unsuccessful, failing to address many of the problematic issues that arise from his claim. Locke begins his explanation of private property by establishing how individuals come to possess property separate from the common resources of mankind. The defining feature of a piece of private property is labor, as the individual who performs the â€Å"labour that removes [the good] out of that common state nature left it in† makes the property his own (V. 30). According to Locke, the common resources of nature are open to all mankind, but a good becomes an individual’s own when a person performs some sort of labor on it. This stems from his idea that industry is an extension of self-ownership – people have natural rights of their own being, and extending these personal rights through work is how people come to own other things. Labor is what establishes ownership of a good, and as long as the amount of property taken is within a reasonable and modest amount, people are free to take what resources they must from the Earth. Although Locke argues in favor of the possession of private property, he emphasizes the point that it is â€Å"dishonest† for a man â€Å"to hoard up more than he could make use of† (V. 46). When people take property in excess, perishableShow MoreRelatedJohn Locke and Commercial Capitalism1697 Words   |  7 PagesPolitical philosopher John Locke ideas and theories serve as a foundation in our democratic world. In the Second Treatise of Government sovereignty is placed in the hands of the people. Locke argues that everyone is born equal and has natural rights in the state of nature. He also argues that men have inalienable rights to life, liberty and property. The central argument around the creation of a civil society was with the protection of property. In this essay I will explain Lockes theory of propertyRead MoreLiberal Ideas Of Equality And The Right Of Law1591 Words   |  7 Pagesindustrialisation and economic growth that came along with it (Fielding et al. 2009, p. 107). In this essay, some of the many key ideas of classical liberalism will be discussed, such as individualism and personal liberty, equality and rule of law and property and the free market principle, drawing heavily from work by John Locke. Next, Locke’s work will be discussed to show how the development of liberal ideals from Thomas Hobbes. Lastly, substantive equality will be contrasted to explain how upper classRead MoreLiberalism And The Ethical And Logical Level Essay1332 Words   |  6 Pagesrights movements. We will be discussing the theories of some liberal authors such as John Rawls, Locke, Mill, Nozick, and Waldron among others whose philosophies clash on the ethical and logical level. We will discuss the following proposal; ‘’the government can no more act†¦ to advance human excellence, or the values of perfection†¦ than it can to advance Catholicism or Protestantism, or any other religion’ (John Rawls). We will then attempt to answer the following questions; why do so many liberalsRead MoreEthical Approaches Of The Book Justice By Michael J. Quot ; Utilitarianism, Libertarianism, And Aristotle1050 Words   |  5 PagesThere are 6 ethical approaches in the book Justice by Michael J. Sandel: Utilitarianism, Libertarianism, Locke, Kant, Rawls, and Aristotle. These 6 approaches attempt to explain what should just and what should not. Utilitarianism focuses on the idea that, â€Å"the highest principle or morality is to maximize happiness, the overall balance of pleasure over pain.† The chapter begins with a story about four English sailors who became stranded at sea and who carefully used up all their resources beforeRead MoreTo What Extent Has Modern Liberalism Departed from Classical Liberalism 40933 Words   |  4 PagesThere are huge differences between classical and modern liberalism and as a result classical liberals believe that modern liberals have not stayed true to initial ideas posed by the likes of John Locke given that modern liberals have embraced collectivism while classical liberals favoured pure individualism. But they are fundamentally both forms of liberalism so are united in their belief of freedom and rights of the individual but they have slightly different views on the type of freedom they supportRead MorePros And Cons Of Anarchy1336 Words   |  6 Pagessocial contract being bro ken. On the other hand, John Locke, who was also an English 17th century philosopher, believed that isolated individuals are born with natural rights to life, liberty, and property. Even though he is a firm believer in that one has the liberty to do what one pleases without permission from anyone else, he insists that one s freedom should not infringe on someone else’s freedom. Interestingly, anarchists would disagree with Locke in that property is freedom because they wouldRead MoreThe Morality Of The Market System897 Words   |  4 PagesState University Dr. E.A Chavez October 29, 2015 Chapter 3 discusses the morality of the market system as a whole. The chapter examines several key components. The chapter discusses how market systems are justified, and explains the strengths and weaknesses of the various systems currently in use. Two concepts are discussed one says that the business system should be planned; the other that it should be a free market system. Further the chapter discusses the various argumentsRead More Locke Vs. Locke Essay examples1174 Words   |  5 PagesThis essay will attempt to compare and contrast the beliefs of John Locke and Karl Marx on the ideas of labor and property with their connections to the aspects of the human condition, as well as determine who holds the most feasible or fair account of property. To begin, Locke believes that property is not a quot;thingquot;, rather, it is a relationship between an individual and an item. Property is a natural condition in John Lockeamp;#8217;s state of nature, meaning it was present since theRead MoreJohn Locke And Jean Jacques Rousseau Essay1583 Words   |  7 Pagesmarked within history to be a time when intellectuals first began to explore established views in relation to religion, science, economics, goverments and laws. Dating back to 1588,Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) English philosopher, conditional defender of monarchy as the source of civic order (Explorations, 2014).Three philosophers in particular being Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were the key thinkers within the philosophy of social justice, influencing the main idea of a socialRead MoreBook Review of Sandal1245 Words   |  5 Pagesutilitarian calculus of increasing pleasure and minimizing pain for the greatest number of people. He would move beyond both J ohn Locke and Jeremy Bentham in asserting that a just society cant be achieved simply by maximizing utility or by securing freedom of choice (Sandal 261). Justice and morality involve making judgments on a wide variety of issues, including inequality of wealth and incomes, discrimination against women and minorities, CEP pay, government bailouts of banks and public education

Savva Monologue Essay Example For Students

Savva Monologue Essay A monologue from the play by Leonid Andreyev NOTE: This monologue is reprinted from Savva and The Life of Man: Two Plays by Leonid Andreyev. Trans. Thomas Seltzer. Boston: Little, Brown Company, 1917. KONDRATY: There is no God here there\s only the devil. This is a terrible place to live in, on my word it is, Mr. Savva. I am a man of experience. It\s no easy thing to fright me. But I am afraid to walk in the hall at night. To you educated people, he appears in a nobler aspect, of course; but to us plain, simple people, he reveals himself as he really is. We have no peace in our monastery; there is always such a noise and clatter there. Everything is quiet outside; but inside there are groans and gnashing of teeth. Some groan, some whine, and some complain about something, you can\t tell what. When you pass the doors, you feel as if your soul were taking leave of the world behind every door. Suddenly something glides from around the corner and there\s a shadow on the wall. Nothing at all and yet there\s a shadow on the wall. In other places it makes no difference. You pay no attention to such a trifle as a shadow; but here, Savva Yegorovich, they are alive, and you can almost h ear them speak. On my word of honor! Our hall, you know, is so long that it seems never to end. You enter nothing! You see a sort of black object moving in front of you, something like the figure of a man. Then it stretches out, grows larger and larger and wider and wider until it reaches across the ceiling, and then it\s behind you! You keep on walking. Your senses become paralyzed. You lose all consciousness. And God is impotent here. Of course we have sacred relics and a wonder-working icon; but, if you\ll excuse me for saying so, they have no efficacy. None whatever. If you don\t believe me, ask the other monks. They\ll bear me out. We pray and pray, and beat our foreheads, and the result is nothing, absolutely nothing. If the image did nothing else than drive away the impure power! But it can\t do even that. It hangs there as if it were none of its business, and as soon as night comes, the stir and the gliding and the flitting around the corners begin again. The abbot says we are cowards, poor in spirit, and that we ought to be ashamed. But why are the images ineffective? The monks in the monestary say well, it\s hard to believe. It\s impossible. But they say the devil stole the real image long ago the one that could perform miracles and hung up his own picture instead.